I know someone who lost several family members and two pets over the last six months. The relatives were close--not the type who hide in Alaska and are not seen for years--but the near and dear who they spoke to and interacted with on a regular basis. In fact, they were favorites.
The family dog was a favorite too, so much so in fact that many said she was the best dog they had ever known.
So a bargain was struck by the owner after the dog started to act sick. Please, they said, let us have the dog. You have taken a godmother, a grandmother, a great-grandmother--why do you need the beloved pet? She is young. Let her live. Let her live and things will be put on hold. In fact, it would be taken as a sign that maybe they would reconsider their atheism. They would even pray again. Let them have the dog! Fix her--fix her and let them keep her until she was older, with grey around her muzzle and she had a hard time walking--not because of an illness--but because she had genuinely been around the block enough times.
The career could be put on hold too--it could wait. They could even focus on church. Just give her a few more years.
They closed their eyes peacefully that night because the vet called and told them that even though she had a stroke, her neurological symptoms were improving.
But the phone rang at 7:00 am, and middle of the night and early morning phone calls are rarely good news. This was no different.
The dog was worse, in fact she was worse off than any of the other dogs at the hospital--and now she was suffering. So now a choice had to be made.
She was gone by noon.
They still had plenty to be thankful for. They had each other.
But the point is there was no one listening. No prayers were answered, and it was the final straw. Desperate times make us do desperate things, and in this case the last-ditch prayers once again fell on deaf ears--or more likely just echoed on and on into space.
We are fools. We are raised to genuflect to an being that we never see. We are told to love someone who does not speak to us when we talk, or answer our heart-felt prayers. We are told to give up our earthly lives and through faith live for a spirit who instills separateness and judgement in a world that so much needs togetherness.
Maybe they did it wrong. Maybe they were speaking to someone who is too occupied, or confused, or overwhelmed. Maybe they needed to speak to someone who would listen.
Maybe there is no one listening.
They asked me what was worse, if someone was listening and chose to ignore them? Or if there was no one at all.
Pages
- FREE Sample from 100 Unfortunate Days
- FREE Sample from ABSORBED
- FREE Sample from The Daughter of Nostradamus. It's DARK.
- PICS, PAGES, and EXTRAS. Click below.
- Haunted Candle, Demon, and The Lady ~ PHOTOS
- 100 Unfortunate Days ~ Read Here
- My Next Big Thing!
- This is NOT a Photo!! Unreal Photorealism
- Witches Mojito, A Delicious Concoction with an Extra Dash of Moonlight
- 5 Star Review of 100 UNFORTUNATE DAYS by GOTH MOM (Lite!)
- LISTEN to an excerpt from 100 UNFORTUNATE DAYS here.
- THIS IS A PAINTING!
- Etsy Haunts
Showing posts with label atheist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atheist. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
A Loss of Fear

Growing up in a Russian orthodox household meant there was holy water in the cabinet, a prominent painting of the last supper in the dining room, and a somber picture of Jesus in my grandmother's bedroom that was supposed to be uplifting and calming, I'm sure, but never failed to freak me out.
I didn't realize it at the time, but it also meant that I was afraid of many things: the devil, ghosts, the dark, and almost anything you could think of that was considered "supernatural".
I also had a thing about eyes--if they weren't your basic blue or brown they also freaked me out. The thought of looking out the window at night to see a pair of glowing amber eyes was almost too much to bear, but that is another post: Click here for more about EYES
Needless to say everyone went to church on Sunday, but I protested too much after about the age of ten. My fussing got old and it wasn't worth it for the rest of the worshipers, and I got to stay home. I bounced back and forth from being a lukewarm believer, to an atheist.
Studying religions was my attempt at finding meaning, and I did learn quite a bit about Buddhism, Christianity, Taoism, and many more, but the only thing I truly gleaned from the endless studying was a bit of self-discovery.
I did not believe in the God of the bible.
Yet, like so many, the things we learn when we are young are difficult to unlearn. I realized I was still afraid to "sin", so I would occasionally attempt another shot at church or bible study. My husband is Catholic, and I always ended up in the Catholic church by default. Although the masses always left me cold, for me it was deeper. There was some kind of disconnect, and after reading the bible, really reading, not listening to what someone else said about it, I knew I not only disbelieved in the god of the bible--I did not like the premise.
I'm not going to get into the whole thing here, but when I finally let it go, when I really allowed myself to not be afraid a giant holy ghost was going to strike me dead and send me to hell for saying the lords name in vain too many times, I lost my fears.
A few nights ago I woke at 3 am. I checked the laundry downstairs and shut the lights off in the hall. I realized, ridiculously enough, that up until about a year ago this would have bothered me.
My long winded point is this--when we stop doing the things that make us afraid of ourselves, we stop being afraid of everything else, too.
xo
Labels:
atheism,
atheist,
bible,
bible study,
buddhism,
catholic,
catholic church,
Christianity,
demons,
devil,
fear,
fear of the dark,
fears,
paranormal,
religion,
russian orthodox,
satan,
supernatural,
witchcraft
Thursday, June 19, 2014
I Have Issues with the Bible
The bible ended up in shreds, and I became an instant atheist.
A few years after that I became acquainted with a born again Christian who suggested that I read the whole bible instead of being in a bad place about my friend's passing.
So I did.
I have an open mind if I have anything, and I certainly liked the idea of giving God and the bible another shot. I had a funny, positive feeling about her suggestion. I felt I would read this book and have many revelations (no pun intended).
And I did--but not the kind I thought I would have.
Instead of learning that God is a loving and kind being that the priest told me about when my mom could still get me to go to church on Sunday, I read that God is pretty vengeful and tricky.
For instance, he created man in his image, and gave him free will and the ability to choose. He also gave him original sin, although I do not understand why. So then he didn't like what his creations were doing--and destroyed them all! What? God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because he did not like what the people in the city had become? The bible said its inhabitants were "depraved". So instead of helping and fixing things (he was right there waiting!) he "rained down sulfur from the heavens." And he had already done this once before with Noah--not with sulfur, but with a terrible and all encompassing flood. Hmmm....
Sounds like a bad father to me...
Deuteronomy has plenty of He-Man Woman Haters Club quotes that not only make me angry, but make me feel I want nothing to do with the Christian religion. (I AM Christian, Russian Orthodox to be exact, but do not practice).
For example:
Deuteronomy 22:13-21 states that if a woman is not a virgin on her wedding night she must be executed. (No mention of men here...)
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 tells us that a virgin who is raped must marry her rapist.
Deuteronomy 25:11-12 warns that if a woman stands up for her husband in a fight by grabbing the other man's genitals then her hand shall be cut off and no pity shall be shown to her.
What the hell?!
God could not have said these things...could he?
And speaking of God saying things, why is it he was talking up a storm back then, but we hear nothing but a resounding echo of our own voices when we talk to him now?
Back to the bible...
Remember when you were in school and kids got picked on by bullies? The bullies said they would beat you up after school, or tell you to do something mean to another unsuspecting victim or else they would beat YOU up. Awful kids. Well, remember what God said to Abraham? He told him to take his only son Isaac and kill him. Abraham was ready to do it. Suddenly God said nope--it was just a test. I would not care if I were offered eternal life, a home in heaven, feathery wings and a solid gold halo--if someone or something told me to kill my only son I would cordially invite him to go fuck himself. I don't see much difference between this God and the bullies in school. Here is a chart that supposedly explains what God meant:
God told Abraham to kill his son
Why do I need a chart to explain this? Why does Jesus speak in such confusing language? In Mark, Jesus says he speaks in parables to confuse people so they will go to hell :) Again--what?? When Jesus was asked why he spoke in parables, he told his disciples they would be shown the mysteries of heaven--but not the others. So basically you had to believe BEFORE you were shown any of the truth.
Sigh. I don't like his methods.
Again--I would not hang around with this person in school and would not want him as a friend--why would I want to consider him my heavenly "father".
Old Testament, you say? True. But the new says in Matthew 5:17:
Jesus strongly approves of the law and the prophets. He hasn't the slightest objection to the cruelties of the Old Testament.
I also don't care for the fact that we are told we can't do anything without Jesus--and we are nothing without him. That is very much contradictory to what I want my son to know. He should know that you have the power inside to run your own lives, and the decisions you make are what will shape you.
And why did Jesus need to kill a fig tree? A fig tree that he was mad at for not bearing fruit--even though it was not fig season...ah...he did it to show how much God hated figs, because he wanted figs and could not find any. This sounds like a petulant three year old who is told they can't have a lollipop.
Of course there is the part that says "true" Christians can cast out devils, speak in tongues, take up serpents, drink poisons without harm, and cure the sick by touching them. Nope. Just not true. Another radical Christian lost his life this past February after handling poisonous snakes and refusing medical treatment after he was bitten.
Yes, I know people go to church and feel Christianity and the bible show them the "good and proper" way to live, and I have nooo problem with that, if you are actually using it to be a better person. If you are a believer who condemns others, looks down on certain lifestyles, judges anyone who is not a believer in Jesus, or harms others because of your beliefs, then maybe you should find a better way to be a "good" person.
Although I can't prove there is NOT a God, the book that tells me that I must believe in one or I will forever burn in a fiery pit of hell is not the kind of book for me.
Labels:
atheism,
atheist,
bible,
bully,
Christianity,
Deuteronomy,
god,
hell,
jesus,
mark,
matthew,
new testament,
noah,
old testament,
pray,
religion,
sodom and gomorrah
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Isaac Asimov, C.S. Lewis, and the Reagan Doctrine
I was feeling inadequate and incomplete because of my skepticism about religion and God, so I requested a clear indication.
And it did seem that the answer to my request for a signal of whether God was indeed there was all signs point to yes.
And then, of course, I had to start thinking.
My average education was not serving me well here, so I looked up two scholars, Isaac Asimov, and C.S. Lewis.
Both frighteningly over educated, and born within 25 years of one-another, they had strikingly different views of God and religion.
Lewis, from Ireland, was an atheist, then theist, and eventually a devout Christian.
Asimov, originally from Russia but smuggled into the United States by his parents, probably could be called a reluctant atheist.
Lewis writes in blossoming, flowing and rich descriptions in contrast with Asimov's sharp, clean and direct sentences. Asimov won Nebula and Hugo awards for his writings, and his short story "Nightfall" is considered by many the best science fiction story ever written. Read "Nightfall" here:
http://doctord.dyndns.org:8000/stories/nightfall.htm
Lewis has written the Narnia series, The Screwtape Letters, and many additional Christian-themed books, several made into well-known and popular movies. He was moved to re-devotion to Christianity partially by his good friend J. R. R. Tolkien, author of The Hobbit.
Asimov called himself an atheist, but with reservations. He believed the term stated what he did not believe in, but neglected what he did. He considered himself a humanist. Although he wrote in simple and straightforward sentences, his mind was anything but simple. He was a long-standing member of Mensa, and served as VP of the High IQ Society.
And now to the theological arguments.
Lewis's books argue that most evidence is based in favor of Christianity, and reasonable people should therefore be Christian. (This is the most simplified version of his idea.) He did not feel one should believe in Christianity if, in their opinion, the signs pointed otherwise He did not believe "leaps of faith" served a skeptic any purpose. But, for those who considered themselves devout Christians, he believed it better "to believe based on faith rather than evidence. For a complete view of Lewis's ideals please read here:
http://atheism.about.com/od/cslewisnarnia/a/apologist.htm
Asimov pointed out that Ronald Reagan stated that anyone who does not believe in God cannot be trusted because they have nothing to motivate them to behave properly. Asimov felt this was sad, inferring that people needed to be bribed and scared into behaving a certain way according to the "Reagan Doctrine," and we do not have the ability to keep our word or behave properly simply based on a sense of honor. If we help someone, keep a promise, or just act basically decent, we are merely buying a "ticket to heaven."
I found the Reagan Doctrine fascinating, and hope you take the time to read this interesting treatise on a touchy subject. :)
http://www.skeptictank.org/isaac.htm
Everyone thinks the anti-Christ is the devil, but it’s not. It’s a person just like you or me. Then the anti-Christ could tell you that if you do not go to church and follow him, you will go to hell. Or maybe he is right and IF you go to church you are following not the teachings of God, but of Satan. Satan is the father of lies, right? How the hell are we supposed to know who is lying
And it did seem that the answer to my request for a signal of whether God was indeed there was all signs point to yes.
And then, of course, I had to start thinking.
My average education was not serving me well here, so I looked up two scholars, Isaac Asimov, and C.S. Lewis.
Both frighteningly over educated, and born within 25 years of one-another, they had strikingly different views of God and religion.
Lewis, from Ireland, was an atheist, then theist, and eventually a devout Christian.
Asimov, originally from Russia but smuggled into the United States by his parents, probably could be called a reluctant atheist.
Lewis writes in blossoming, flowing and rich descriptions in contrast with Asimov's sharp, clean and direct sentences. Asimov won Nebula and Hugo awards for his writings, and his short story "Nightfall" is considered by many the best science fiction story ever written. Read "Nightfall" here:
http://doctord.dyndns.org:8000/stories/nightfall.htm
Lewis has written the Narnia series, The Screwtape Letters, and many additional Christian-themed books, several made into well-known and popular movies. He was moved to re-devotion to Christianity partially by his good friend J. R. R. Tolkien, author of The Hobbit.
Asimov called himself an atheist, but with reservations. He believed the term stated what he did not believe in, but neglected what he did. He considered himself a humanist. Although he wrote in simple and straightforward sentences, his mind was anything but simple. He was a long-standing member of Mensa, and served as VP of the High IQ Society.
And now to the theological arguments.
Lewis's books argue that most evidence is based in favor of Christianity, and reasonable people should therefore be Christian. (This is the most simplified version of his idea.) He did not feel one should believe in Christianity if, in their opinion, the signs pointed otherwise He did not believe "leaps of faith" served a skeptic any purpose. But, for those who considered themselves devout Christians, he believed it better "to believe based on faith rather than evidence. For a complete view of Lewis's ideals please read here:
http://atheism.about.com/od/cslewisnarnia/a/apologist.htm
Asimov pointed out that Ronald Reagan stated that anyone who does not believe in God cannot be trusted because they have nothing to motivate them to behave properly. Asimov felt this was sad, inferring that people needed to be bribed and scared into behaving a certain way according to the "Reagan Doctrine," and we do not have the ability to keep our word or behave properly simply based on a sense of honor. If we help someone, keep a promise, or just act basically decent, we are merely buying a "ticket to heaven."
I found the Reagan Doctrine fascinating, and hope you take the time to read this interesting treatise on a touchy subject. :)
http://www.skeptictank.org/isaac.htm
Day 12 of 100 Unfortunate Days
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











